![]() |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
About Vitruvian Man
So, da Vinci's work resulted from the creative interplay between his steadfast devotion to empirical observation, which many people consider a key feature of the sciences, and his ability to fathom and express the human condition, a key feature of the humanities. Why should we expect anything less of contemporary scholars? After all, we've had over 500 years to improve on Leonardo. Have we? Maybe geographers can play a special role in fostering this sort of creative interplay; see UCSB's New Visions of Nature, Science, and Religion program as an example. A final word: putting da Vinci on my home page is not meant to imply Renaissance-manness by association! My own case as a scholar may be better implied by the Dilbert cartoon below.
|
||||||
| www.geog.ucsb.edu/~jproctor/vitruvian.html Last modified: 12 July, 2004 |
||||||